Implementations from the Beginning to Now.
Marshall, Gordon. "Coleman Report". A Dictionary of Sociology. 1998. Encyclopedia.com. 5 Feb. 2011
Wikipedia. James Samuel Coleman. 15 December, 2010. Web. 5 February, 2011.
Zigler, Edward and Susan Muenchow. Head Start: The Inside Story of America's Most Successful Educational Experiment. New York: Basic Books. 1992. Print.
As I had stated in my last bibliography on Head Start, I wanted to see how and what teaching methods have changed since the 1960's. I soon found that there weren't very many recorded studies done until the 1990's. I found that the information that went toward the Head Start program in the 1960's was con-screwed and left very little support. As I met with one of the Head Start advisers on February 5, 2011, Tawnia informed me that, "The Attorney General of the United States implemented the Head Start Program to reduce the delinquency of America's children." I wonder if he was sincere in his declaration to increase the importance and affordability of education in America? There were a couple studies that were conducted just after the first year Head Start had commenced, such as the Coleman Report and the Westinghouse/Ohio Evaluation, that do not paint a pretty picture (Zigler 56).
One study that I want to touch on is the Coleman Report. It was instigated by the US Department of Education and conducted by James Samuel Coleman. The 1966 Coleman Report became a controversial debate for many years. Coleman states that children would learn more from their families than from school (Marshall). I find this a very bold and idiotic statement to make, considering he himself attended college. Only after reading more of this document do we find out that Coleman almost refutes his own claim and states that Black children will only benefit from this program if they are integrated into a predominately white class setting. I believe that his concept of school along with this study may have been influenced by the "white fight" events that were taking place and thus an accurate study may not have been conducted.
In trying to gather some ground that may not have been tainted with racial discrimination, I turned to Edward Zigler's book for answers. He states that within the first year of the Head Start program Students were testing higher than non Head Start students, but after about a month in public school together, the non Head Start students were scoring about the same as the head Start children (56). This leaves the program in danger of becoming decommissioned as a hope for children. This leads me back to my initial question of how Head Start has evolved into this program of salvation that is offered.
It wasn't until meeting with Head Start representatives and reading Edward Zigler's book that I understood the total embodiment that is Head Start. This program is not just a summer school where parents stick children to prepare them for the next school year, although that is an important part, but it furthers children comprehension of basic skills. Head Start provides children with basic health and dental care and nutritious meals daily that they might not otherwise have ever experienced (Zigler 28). Zigler dives into the reasons why this program is such a success. He will stand by Head Start till death do they part as the best way for a young child to further their education and have a chance to succeed in life. Children learn basic life and social skills while interacting with children of similar circumstances. Tawnia of the Boise Head Start center said that children come to her school from all over the world with all different backgrounds because of their circumstances. The children that she watches are from impoverish families that couldn't otherwise educate their young. Also parents are welcomed to join in helping their kids while at the school.
Head Start may have started off as just a program where children from poor families could be taught to read, write, and count. It may have been a scapegoat for officials to pawn concerns to, but it has now grown into a safe haven for children all over the world. Parents now have a place where their children can not only learn to read, write, but to gain the social skills and abilities they need to start their life in this world. Many children now know what it's like to paint a picture, to have a friend, or to have a real nutritious meal to eat. Now children, who's parents just watch TV during meals or are never around, can have the attention and love they deserve. They can gain the self-esteem and motivation to change the world. Head Start has improved dramatically from its primordial state in the 60's from just a low income school to a house of learning. Finally, impoverish children have a new hope, a head start.
• Citations
ReplyDeleteFrom what I can see your citations are pretty good except for the Marshall, Gordon one on your second bibliography entry. You forgot to put down the medium; print, or web. I could be wrong but I also think Encyclopedia. Com is in the wrong spot as well. I myself am struggling with authors so I’m not sure about that in your print source. I need to go to the library tomorrow and ask them more about multiple authors. I’m pretty sure I did mine wrong. For the most part though your citations look good. The info for the Marshall citation is at the web citation part of Owl at Purdue.
• Introduction
I like how you connected your second bibliography to your questions in the first. I also like how you brought an outside source (the head start advisor) into your entry. I am a little confused though if Tawnia is the advisor. It would be nice if you could give some more information on who Tawnia is and specify whether or not he/she is the Head Start advisor. Also if that is a direct quote from Tawnia it needs to be cited as well, both in text and in a citation up top. You did a really good job though adding your own voice into the mix and communicating with the sources.
• 2nd and 3rd paragraph.
I like that you are being a bit more skeptical. In the last article we read Deans talks about not criticizing your sources but filling in the holes they leave behind. This is really difficult to do gracefully but you and your audience get more out of it than simply stating what was wrong with the writer’s statements. Sometimes you can also get across your disappointment with a writer without directly stating it. I really like how you delved deeper into what caused Coleman’s thought process though. That helps a lot in understanding his views and where he is coming from.
I am curious in the third paragraph if the “non-Head Start students” were from families in poverty as well? If not the even scores could be a good thing. I did see that you had an in text citation in the third paragraph that has no name only a number. Also be careful of putting too much opinion into it. “Program of salvation” can be taken as advocacy toward head start. Unfortunately we have to try to stay neutral and not sway toward any particular point of view. All in all I am really happy that you found so many great sources and information. You can tell you put a lot of work into your research.
• Analysis
You do a great job here summing up your bibliography. You bring a lot more clarity to what Head Start is and what it is about. Again I absolutely love that you brought Tawnia’s point of view into this. Your last paragraph is also brilliant! Your writing is very smooth, and flows well. This is defiantly my favorite part of the bibliography entry.
• Great Job!